MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244392749 · doi:10.4000/hms.402

KEEL Othmar, La médecine des preuves. Une histoire de l’expérimentation thérapeutique par essais cliniques contrôlés

2013· article· fr· W4244392749 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandre Klein

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire médecine et santé · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis sa thèse de doctorat sur Cabanis (Cabanis et la généalogie épistémologique de la médecine clinique, 1977), dirigée par Georges Canguilhem, Othmar Keel, aujourd’hui professeur retraité d’histoire de la médecine à l’Université de Montréal, s’est attaché à démontrer le rôle central de l’histoire dans la compréhension des enjeux éthiques, scientifiques et sociopolitiques de la médecine. De sa relecture de l’influence de Pinel dans l’histoire de l’histopathologie (La généalogie de l’histop...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire médecine et santéSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207