MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244456599 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-300596/v1

A new approach to find gouge free tool positions for a toroidal cutter for Bezier surfaces in Five axis machining

2021· preprint· en· W4244456599 on OpenAlexaff
Mukhmeet Sing, Jerry Qu, Ravinder Kumar Duvedi, Sanjeev Bedi, Stephen Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachiningBézier curveToroidPoint (geometry)Bézier surfaceComputer scienceSurface (topology)SpeedupPosition (finance)Factor (programming language)Mechanical engineeringEngineering drawingGeometryEngineeringMathematicsParallel computingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We implement and test a multi-point machining tool positioning technique that positions the tool using only a variation on gouge checking. The result is a method that is roughly twice as fast as an earlier method that performed a numerical search to find a tool position with multiple points of contact with the design surface. A GPU implementation provides an additional factor of ten speedup. Verification of the method was done via simulation and machining and measuring physical parts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207