MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244471088 · doi:10.2460/javma.249.6.629

Book Reviews

2016· article· en· W4244471088 on OpenAlexaff
Kristin Sinclair

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBird parasitology and diseases
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The third edition of Avian Medicine has changed substantially, compared with previous editions, and those changes make it a valuable addition to the reference library of any veterinarian who examines and treats birds.Detailed and concise descriptions and illustrations are provided for basic procedures such as blood film and cytologic evaluations, sample collection and storage, and nursing care.Surgical procedures are succinctly described with text and helpful images, as are many common diseases.This book is intended to provide pertinent information in a concise manner for busy practitioners.It is not a comprehensive guide for all subjects, and those interested in detailed information on species-specific anatomy, physiology, or disease will need to consult other reference sources.New to this edition are chapters on behavior and cognition, breeding and neonatal care, oiled bird management, and feather destructive behavior.The sections on analgesia and fluid therapy have been expanded and updated.Whereas the previous editions of the book tended to be primarily focused on raptor medicine with brief mention of other avian species, this edition appears to have a better balance of information among raptors and psittacine, passerine, and other avian species.The tables and appendices in particular have been updated and streamlined, making them much easier to consult, and they now include reference intervals for ECG, echocardiographic, and radiographic evaluations.Overall, this book will be a good reference for anyone interested in avian medicine regardless of experience level.From the detailed information on basic techniques to advanced fracture repair, this edition has something for everyone and is a welcome addition to this reviewer's bookshelf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4930.441

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Veterinary Medical AssociationSame topicBird parasitology and diseasesFrench-language works237,207