Dual-lasing channel quantum cascade laser based on scattering-assisted injection design: erratum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We correct three typographical errors in our published paper [ Opt. Express 26 , 9194 ( 2018 ) 10.1364/OE.26.009194 ]. First, we correct the error in the Table 1. The injection coupling strength for the summarized device in the first raw is corrected to 1.5 meV. Second, we correct the listed reference 10 to “S. Kumar, C. W. I. Chan, Q. Hu, and J. L. Reno, “A 1.8-THz quantum cascade laser operating significantly above the temperature of ℏω/k B ,” Nat. Phys. 7(2), 166–171 (2011).” Third, we correct the typographical error in the quantum structure layer thickness description. The text description on quantum structure layer thickness is correct to 40.3 /74.4/ 24.1 /103.6/ 29.7 /79.7/ 40.3 /156.7, which is the correct number extracted from high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD) measurement and used in simulation through the manuscript. The corrections do not alter the figures and conclusions in manuscript.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".