MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[no title]

2016· article· W4244547536 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michele Levy

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Literature Today · 2016
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGerman legal, social, and political studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDozenGermanReading (process)AdventureFellLiteratureShot (pellet)HistorySpace (punctuation)Art historyArtLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceLinguisticsCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ulitskaya pushes her reader into experiential reading, particularly in part 2, where, as Ignashev aptly states in the translator ’s afterword to the book, “the core of the novel lies in your, the reader’s, experience .” Ulitskaya’s novel is a true enigma—it is mysterious, layered, and fascinating. She was once quoted saying, “We tell stories we want to tell.” As a reader, I can say that we read stories we want to read, and this novel, without any hesitation, is a must-read. Natalia Cousineau Edmonton, Alberta Juli Zeh. Unterleuten. Munich. Luchterhand Literaturverlag. 2016. 640 pages. Germany fell in love with Unterleuten, and Juli Zeh’s “great German novel” shot to the top of the fiction best-seller lists. It has stayed there, a popular success despite its hefty size. Or, perhaps because of it: it allows space for a dozen edgily characterized players to take the stage alternately— sometimes in first person, mostly as seen by the narrator. They grow familiar as we follow the winding plotlines, a little like a cast in a soap. The set is a village, Unterleuten (“among people”), that hides in among fir-tree forests on the sandy flatlands around Berlin. A backwater but a place where the villagers, like it or not, feel they belong—a “Heimat.” This is not a rural feel-good story, however . The author takes no prisoners: Zeh, an ex-UN human rights lawyer as well as a very good writer, is mercilessly observant and well informed, occasionally compassionate, and often witty. Zeh has been engaged in politics (the red-green variety), but here she acerbically dissects what happens to political ideas “at the grassroots level.” The villagers in Unterleuten share generational memories of violations in the name of politics; staying below the radar is part of their way of life. Now, in 2010, a plan for a commercial wind farm is enough to trigger unrest: everyone knows that European Union directives can cause as much trouble as any communist or capitalist articles of faith. Worse, metropolitan Germany is taking an interest: a Bavarian plutocrat is scheming to exploit his chance purchase of 250 local hectares, and middle-class Berliners are chasing nice property deals in their rustic hinterland. Throughout, fields, meadows, and forests are silent but potent presences. Villagers and incomers alike are driven by a deep-rooted, almost physical need to possess land, to “fence off one’s own piece of the world.” Acquiring ownership justifies the means, and when mendacity and betrayal fail, there is always violence. Brutality surfaces in many forms, from harassment and deliberate cruelty to perverse acts of revenge. Two old men, a successful agribusinessman and a displaced comrade from the one-time DDR farming collective , reengage in past conflicts, and their twenty-year-long feud grows into a prime source of vicious ill feeling. Neither man is a monster but both die, one bitterly disappointed , the other soothed by delusions. Zeh handles the plotting as brilliantly as the characterization and adds to the fun of reading by spiking the narrative with aphorisms . Some are mocking quotes from a fictive self-help guru, others reflections by characters, as in “[Linda] is so convinced of an optimal state that even when she gets her way, reality seems deficient.” Unterleuten is analytical, thought-provoking, and a wonderful read. Anna Paterson Aberdeenshire, UK Jovanka Živanović. Fragile Travelers. Trans. Jovanka Kalaba. Victoria, Texas. Dalkey Archive Press. 119 pages. Like many postmodern Yugoslav novels, Jovanka Živanović’s slim debut, Fragile Travelers, mines magical realism in its shifts between, and merging of, reality and fantasy. In its first chapter, “Coffee Lovers Move in Mysterious Ways,” Petar Naumov goes out for coffee and becomes “stuck in” Emilija Savić’s dream. This opening sets Travelers’ tone, plot, and theme: a search for meaning in a soulless global culture that reads like a Woody Allen riff on Kafka. At base level, name etymologies signify both worlds. Common Slavic names, Petar and Ema, carry spiritual connotations: Peter, the “rock” upon which Jesus built his church; Ema, the universal or whole. Naumov signifies the son of Nahum, a Hebrew prophet, and Savić evokes St. Sava, the Enlightener. If Ema’s earnest lawyer...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Literature TodaySame topicGerman legal, social, and political studiesFrench-language works237,207