MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4244549222 · doi:10.3410/f.5667958.5640057

Faculty Opinions recommendation of The S1P(1)-mTOR axis directs the reciprocal differentiation of T(H)1 and T(reg) cells.

2010· dataset· en· W4244549222 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Markus Y. Mapara, Caisheng Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · 2010
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthYork University
KeywordsSphingosine kinase 1PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayFOXP3Cell biologyT cellSphingosineImmune systemChemistrySphingosine-1-phosphateSignal transductionBiologyImmunologyReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Naïve CD4 + T cells differentiate into diverse effector and regulatory lineages to orchestrate immunity and tolerance.The differentiation of pro-inflammatory T H 1 and anti-inflammatory Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) was reciprocally regulated by S1P 1 , a receptor for the bioactive lipid sphingosine-1-phosphate. S1P 1 inhibited extrathymic and natural Treg generation while driving T H 1 cell development in a reciprocal manner and disrupted immune homeostasis.S1P 1 signaled through mTOR and antagonized TGF-β function mainly by attenuating sustained Smad3 activity.S1P 1 function was dependent upon endogenous sphingosine kinase activity.Remarkably, two seemingly unrelated immunosuppressants FTY720 and rapamycin targeted the same S1P 1 and mTOR pathway to regulate the dichotomy between T H 1 and Treg cells.Our studies establish an S1P 1 -mTOR axis that controls T cell lineage specification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4430.170

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature→Same topicT-cell and B-cell Immunology→French-language works237,207→