MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Invertebrate Movements within a Small Stream: Density Dependence or Compensating for Drift?

2000· article· en· W4244572817 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Dorothea Turner, D. Dudley Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Hydrobiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsInvertebrateSTREAMSFecundityEcologyUpstream (networking)Upstream and downstream (DNA)Density dependenceEnvironmental scienceBiologyHydrology (agriculture)GeologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The movements of invertebrates within a permanent first order stream in southern Ontario are described, including: drift, upstream migration and post-emergence flight. Large numbers of invertebrates drift within one year. Fecundity estimates of Nemoura trispinosa (Plecoptera) indicated that the upstream flight of ovipositing females, in conjunction with the within-water upstream migrations of immatures and the immigration of mated females from other streams, was not enough to account for headwater densities depopulated through drift. However, we submit that drift does not threaten the maintenance of headwater populations to the extent that has been suggested, and that drift acts on a density dependent basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of HydrobiologySame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207