MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244583609 · doi:10.1149/ma2021-01461867mtgabs

Influence of Lithium Sulfate on the Kinetics of Hydrogen Oxidation in H<sub>2</sub>so<sub>4</sub>

2021· article· en· W4244583609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manon Faral, Nicolas Sacré, Régis Chenitz, Mickaël Dollé, Asmae Mokrini, Thomas Bibienne

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Gas Emission Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeHydrogen productionElectrolysisElectrolyteLithium (medication)Proton exchange membrane fuel cellPolymer electrolyte membrane electrolysisHydrogenCatalysisInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringChemistryCathodeHigh-pressure electrolysisMaterials scienceElectrodeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last few years, development of lithium ion batteries (LIB) offers innovative solutions for energy storage and has major role in the global energy future. Now used for many purposes, the increase in energy demand is driving the development and the production of LIB towards more environmentally friendly methods while also reducing their production costs. Nemaska lithium, a Canadian collaborator in this project, is recognized as a new producer of lithium hydroxide, a key precursor for high capacity Li-ion cathode material production. In order to reduce the energy costs and to increase the efficiency of its LiOH production, Nemaska lithium is actively working on the optimization of its membrane electrolysis system. One of the possibilities is to replace the anode of the existing electrolysis process with a new technology based on Hydrogen Depolarized Anode (HDA). This new technology is based on hydrogen oxidation instead of oxygen evolution reaction, (H 2(g) → 2H + (aq) +2e - ; E 0 =0,00V vs NHE), this configuration allows for the decrease of the voltage of the electrolysis cell. With a structure similar to proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) anode, an HDA is a porous electrode, supplied with hydrogen from its gas diffusion side and in contact with the electrolyte in the catalyst coated side. The reaction itself is taking place in a small part of the electrode called the catalytic layer. It consists of a triple phase; an ionomer (for the proton’s transport), platinum nanoparticles (used as catalyst) and a conductive carbon (for electron transport). This study is focusing on two aspects that can influence the performance of the catalytic layer: the impact of the electrolyte on the reaction kinetics and its composition on its efficiency. In order to further advance our knowledge of the reaction mechanism occurring at the HDA, a study on the reaction kinetic of hydrogen oxidation on platinum was conducted. Usually studied in sulphuric acid, the reaction is monitored in this case in the presence of lithium sulfate. For this study, a rotating disk electrode (RDE) has been used. The advantage of this hydrodynamic method is to reduce the dependence of the system on mass transport in order to isolate kinetic current. Using the Koutecky-Levich equation combined with RDE measurements, a logarithmic representation of Tafel slopes for different lithium concentrations have been determined. Linking overpotential to current density, the Tafel curves are used to determine the influence of lithium sulfate on the kinetic of hydrogen oxidation. In a first step, the study was performed on platinum disk electrode. With this well-established system, it was possible to conclude a significant decrease in reaction kinetic in the presence of the salt. Subsequently, the same technique is conducted on a vitreous carbon electrode, where a porous catalytic layer close to HDA configuration is deposited. This configuration allows to study the impact of ionomer presence close to Pt nanoparticles that would change interface between platinum surface and lithium salt electrolyte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicIndustrial Gas Emission ControlFrench-language works237,207