Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) have been associated with mitochondrial toxicity in individuals receiving treatment. A report of two deaths in Europe attributed to mitochondrial dysfunction in HIV-uninfected infants with perinatal NRTI exposure prompted a review of five U.S. cohorts. Methods: Deaths in HIV-exposed children <60 months of age and HIV-uninfected or indeterminate were reviewed. Review included birth history; perinatal antiretroviral drug exposure; hospital, laboratory, and clinic records; death reports; autopsy results; and local physician queries. Deaths were classified as unrelated (Class 1), unlikely related (Class 2), possibly related (Class 3), or highly suggestive or proven relationship (Class 4), to mitochondrial dysfunction; sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) was categorized separately. Results and Conclusions: Among over 20,000 children of HIV-infected women, over half of whom had been exposed to NRTIs, 223 died. In HIV-uninfected children, 26 deaths were attributed to Class 1, and 4 were attributed to SIDS. In HIV-indeterminate children, 141, 10, 3, and 0 were Classes 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; 33 were due to SIDS and 6 could not be classified. There was no indication that antiretroviral exposure was associated with Class 2 or 3 deaths, or deaths from SIDS. A search for mitochondrial dysfunction among living children in these cohorts is ongoing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.426 | 0.262 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".