MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4244588182 · doi:10.4000/ifha.8152

Julia Anna Riedel, Bildungsreform und geistliches Ordenswesen im Ungarn der Aufklärung. Die Schulen der Piaristen unter Maria Theresia und Joseph II

2014· article· de· W4244588182 on OpenAlexaff
Juliette Guilbaud

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2014
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce copieux volume, issu d’une thèse d’histoire soutenue par l’auteure en 2010 à l’université de Tübingen, traite de la réforme de l’enseignement dans la Hongrie du xviiie siècle. Cette réforme est l’occasion d’une confrontation entre le pouvoir monarchique – sous les règnes de Marie-Thérèse puis de Joseph II (précisément entre 1773 et 1790 – et l’un des principaux ordres enseignants alors présents dans le royaume, celui des piaristes. Ces deux acteurs se révèlent portés par des intérêts diff...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne→Same topicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics→French-language works237,207→