Bibliographic record
Abstract
Note: page numbers in italics refer to figures, those in bold refer to tables and boxes acamprosate 358, 361, 362, 363 acetylcholine 210-15, 212, 255 activator protein-1 (AP-1) 236 adaptive function 309 adenosine 396 cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) pathway 232-3 adherence see treatment adherence adolescents 54, 55 Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy 437-8 medications 483-4 adrenergic-cholinergic balance hypothesis 211-12 adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 218, 401 affect, sleep and circadian function 265 affective disorders 8, 9, 84-5 affective symptom treatment 28 age of onset 334 early onset illness 102-3, 482 ageing 98, 232 see also elderly patients agomelatine 398 air travel 335 alcohol abuse/dependence 31-3 comorbid 354, 417-18, 490 treatment 360-1, 362-3 elderly patients 490 maintenance therapy 313-14 pregnancy 466 psychoeducation 417-18 rapid cycling bipolar disorder 335 treatment 32-3, 360-1, 362-3 withdrawal syndrome 357-8 women 464 allopurinol 396
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.780 | 0.709 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".