MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244639189 · doi:10.1787/9789264213951-5-en

SME and entrepreneurship issues and policies in Italy: Assessment and recommendations

2014· book-chapter· en· W4244639189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOECD studies on SMEs and entrepreneurship · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFirm Innovation and Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessEuropean unionInvestment (military)PopulationValue (mathematics)Eu countriesInternational tradeGeographyPolitical scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SMEs and entrepreneurs are the backbone of the Italian economy. With nearly 100 enterprises per thousand people its business density is one of the highest among OECD countries. One-quarter of the working population is self-employed, the second-highest rate in the European Union (EU). Italian SMEs contribute 80% of national employment and 67% of value added, the third and fifth highest shares in the OECD area respectively. SMEs are also at the core of Italy’s export and innovation performance, accounting for over 50% of the total volume of exports and 22% of business R&D investment. The share of firms that are young, with less than three years of age (14% of Italian enterprises), is in line with the most entrepreneurial OECD economies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOECD studies on SMEs and entrepreneurshipSame topicFirm Innovation and GrowthFrench-language works237,207