MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244671793 · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldt003

Diabetic gastroparesis

2013· review· en· W4244671793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Medical Bulletin · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGastroparesisMedicineBloatingGastric emptyingVomitingNauseaComplicationIntensive care medicineAbdominal painDiabetes mellitusProkinetic agentInternal medicineGastroenterologyStomachEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Diabetic gastroparesis (DGP) is a gastric complication of diabetes mellitus that causes nausea, vomiting, early satiety, bloating and abdominal pain, in addition to significant morbidity. SOURCES OF DATA: Original and review articles were reviewed through PubMed, including relevant guidelines from the European and American Neurogastroenterology Societies. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Diagnosis of DGP requires endoscopy and measurement of gastric emptying. Management requires prokinetic therapy, usually in addition to antinausea or other medications. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The pathogenesis of DGP is poorly understood. Management strategies are highly variable. Growing points Prokinetic and neuromodulatory medications are in human clinical trials specifically for gastroparesis. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Further understanding of the molecular pathology leading to DGP is required to potentially arrest the development of this serious diabetic complication. Evaluation of novel agents for use in DGP is sorely needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it