MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244758340 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.10039943.v2

A Thermal Imaging Methodology To Study Evaporation Kinetics in Mine Tailings

2020· preprint· en· W4244758340 on OpenAlexaff
Josée Maurais, Étienne Beaumont, Joanick Bourret, Emrik Dauphinais, Nicolas-Alexandre Bouchard, Patrick Ayotte

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsBauxiteEvaporationEnvironmental scienceDiffusionThermalMining engineeringMaterials scienceGeologyMeteorologyMetallurgyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predicting why, how, and when mine tailings disposal sites become prone to dust scattering events is often hampered by our limited understanding of the factors that affect the drying rates from their surface layers. As a case study, thermal imaging is demonstrated here to be a valuable tool to study the evaporation mechanisms and rates from bauxite residues as a function of their thickness and physicochemical properties, as well as environmental conditions. These investigations reveal their that late stage drying rates are limited by gas phase diffusion through the interstitial air within their internal microporosity. The smallness of the effective diffusion coefficient indicates that water adsorption on bauxite residues surfaces is the dominant phenomenon responsible for their slow water vapour transport kinetics, a phenomenon that ultimately controls their late stage drying rates, that is when dust scattering is most likely to occur. As such, application of this thermal imaging methodology in the field may also contribute to improve the accuracy of risk assessment protocols, support intervention and mitigation strategies, underpin optimization efforts for mining residues management, and improve forecasting of fugitive dust emissions from mine tailings by enabling more accurate predictions of the evolution in their surface drying state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207