MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4244811705 · doi:10.24124/2020/59161

Curious case of the coastal tailed frog (ascaphus truei) near the northern extent of its range

2021· dissertation· en· W4244811705 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cherie Marie Mosher

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)EcologyAbundance (ecology)PopulationHabitatPhylogeographyGeographyLarvaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ascaphus truei, an ancient species of frog, migrated into British Columbia, Canada, following the last ice age. A. truei is of conservation interest because forestry practices, and the associated infrastructure, may reduce habitat quality. There is also concern that a warmer and drier climate will change the distribution and abundance of this species. I used two genetic methods, microsatellites and next-generation sequencing, to compare the genetic diversity of A. truei from the northern extent of its range in British Columbia, CA to southern Washington, USA. Both methods suggested a dramatic reduction in diversity across the northern portion of the species’ range. The phylogeography suggests a northern range expansion from a single refugium. I used DNA metabarcoding to compare the gut contents of larvae across three stream reaches and two development classes near the northern extent of A. truei's range. Gut contents differed between stream reach but did not differ among development class. Wetted width and ultimately stream volume may influence differences in gut content among stream reaches. I also quantified the relationship between an index of larvae density and environmental factors hypothesized to influence population density near the northern extent of the range. I assessed the segregation of larvae at various developmental stages. Wetted width and wetted depth correlated with differences in the abundance of larvae. Older developmental stages were captured in stream reaches with greater slopes than younger stages. Management should minimize modifications of stream structure, such as in-stream siltation due to road building. We should maintain habitat connectivity and gene flow to ensure the continued migration and adaptive capacity of A. truei.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies→French-language works237,207→