MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244867591 · doi:10.1215/9781478007500

Theft Is Property!

2020· book· en· W4244867591 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Robert Nichols

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoVictoria UniversityUniversity of OxfordUniversity of CambridgeMcKnight FoundationYork UniversityNew Zealand GovernmentQueen's UniversityLouisiana State UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of California, IrvineMcGill University
KeywordsWishProperty (philosophy)Flag (linear algebra)Work (physics)Internet privacyComputer scienceComputer securitySociologyPsychologyEpistemologyArtEngineeringPhilosophyLiteratureMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I did not have the opportunity to incorporate the insights of her book into my own but wish to flag the importance of her work in thinking through similar concerns as those that animate this book.The person who has most sustained and supported me through this long pro cess

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2890.287

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207