Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2013–2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
an advisory Committee statement (aCs) national advisory Committee on immunization (naCi) Statement on SeaSonal Influenza VaccIne for 2013-2014Please note: The provision of recommendations regarding immunization of swine workers as a means to protect swine herds is not within the scope of NACI.For animal health concerns, the reader should refer to appropriate animal health resources.Preamble the national advisory Committee on immunization (naCi) provides the public Health agency of Canada (hereafter referred to as the agency) with ongoing and timely medical, scientific and public health advice relating to immunization.the agency acknowledges that the advice and recommendations set out in this statement are based upon the best currently available scientific knowledge and is disseminating this document for information purposes.people administering the vaccine should also be aware of the contents of the relevant product monograph(s).naCi recommendations for use and other information set out herein may differ from that set out in the product monograph(s).manufacturer(s) have sought approval of the vaccine(s) and provided evidence as to its safety and efficacy only when it is used in accordance with the product monographs.naCi members and liaison members conduct themselves within the context of the public Health agency of Canada's policy on Conflict of interest, including yearly declaration of potential conflict of interest.IMPORTANT note regarding antiviral guidelines: antiviral recommendations are no longer under the purview of naCi.Guidance for the practitioner on the use of antiviral medication (www.ammi.ca/guidelines)has been developed by the association of medical microbiology and infectious disease Canada (ammi Canada).nacI members: dr.b.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.018 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".