MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244883310 · doi:10.4000/crm.14000

Introduction

2016· article· fr· W4244883310 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Olivier Canteaut, Xavier Hélary

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, History, and Historiography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentral European UniversityUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tous les contributeurs à cet hommage gardent le souvenir de leur première rencontre avec Elizabeth Brown. Pour nombre d’entre nous, cette rencontre fut d’abord livresque. Ce fut un contact ébloui avec une pensée aussi vive que ferme, avec des idées aussi neuves que cohérentes, avec un esprit critique acéré n’hésitant pas à déconstruire les récits des chroniqueurs aussi bien que les hypothèses hasardeuses de l’historiographie. Ce fut une plongée étourdissante dans des notes foisonnantes, révél...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistesSame topicPhilosophy, History, and HistoriographyFrench-language works237,207