MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<scp>H</scp> ouse, <scp>E</scp> dward <scp>M</scp> andell (1858–1938)

2018· other· en· W4244898204 on OpenAlex
Francis M. Carroll

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Diplomacy · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFriendshipCompromiseNegotiationPresidencyPoliticsPolitical scienceLawHouse of RepresentativesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Edward M. House (1858–1938) formed a strong friendship with Woodrow Wilson in 1911 when the latter was seeking the presidency. Once elected, Wilson found Colonel House to be someone whom he could trust when needing advice about political matters. House's travels in Europe made him a valuable confidant on international affairs and particularly after the First World War broke out in 1914. House represented Wilson in 1915 and 1916 in attempts to open talks to end the war. After the United States entered the war, House spoke for Wilson when negotiating arrangements for American forces and drafting the terms for the Armistice to end the fighting. Wilson appointed House one of the American Commissioners to Negotiate Peace, but their relations deteriorated at the Peace Conference when House proved more willing to compromise with the Europeans than Wilson.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it