MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4244932853 · doi:10.1787/66879a5e-de

Kanada

2019· book-chapter· de· W4244932853 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOECD Wirtschaftsausblick/OECD-Wirtschaftsausblick · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Das Wachstum wird sich den Projektionen zufolge im zweiten Halbjahr 2019 auf rd. 2% (Jahresrate) erholen. Die Ausfuhren werden infolge der Lockerung der staatlich verfügten Kürzung der Ölfördermengen in Alberta und des stärkeren Wachstums der Exportmärkte anziehen. Die Unternehmen werden ihre Investitionen aufstocken, um ihre Kapazitäten und ihre Produktivität zu steigern und von neuen Steueranreizen Gebrauch zu machen. Das Beschäftigungswachstum wird sich voraussichtlich verlangsamen, die Arbeitslosenquote dürfte jedoch nahe ihrem Rekordtiefststand verharren.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5900.358

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOECD Wirtschaftsausblick/OECD-Wirtschaftsausblick→Same topicCanadian Policy and Governance→French-language works237,207→