Bibliographic record
Abstract
8C onclusionAt the end of her life, Goldman again gotinvolvedinastruggle between two opposing factions, namely in support of the anarchists against fascismd uring the Spanish Civil War.¹This war was important,a s" [a]narchism had not received such prominencesince Nestor Makhnofounded an anarchist republic in the Ukraine duringt he RussianC ivil War."²Initially, Goldman seemed to worry about the consequences for the anarchists in Spain: "The Spanish situation also does not add to my joy in life.Our people are being exterminated by the thousands, and everybodyw ill be if the Fascists should succeed.The International pack of hounds are doing their share to help the murderous gangi nS pain.Not so the so called Socialist government.I tr efuses to help the workers.The same old treachery."³However,once she goti nvolveda nd was invitedt op articipate in the anarchist effort,h er mood changed: "Ia mc omingf or aR EAL purpose.Our heroic comrades in Barcelona have asked me to go to England to start acampaign of publicity to counteract the misrepresentations in the British and AmericanPress about them and their trulygigantic fight against Fascism."⁴The Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (CNT) and the Federación Anarquista Ibérica (FAI) had asked her to support the anarchist effort in Spain by raising funds in Britain.ForG oldman, this mission was important and brought her back from her melancholic mood that had endured since Berkman had committed suicide: "The call has savedm ylife.It has inspired me as nothing has since the Russian Revolution.It has pulled me out from the awful pall that was hanging over me."⁵Thousands of women and men from all over the world went to Spaintosupport the cause against fascism, and they would all be bitterly disappointed as they failed to win abetterfuture.⁶Goldman would soon lose her wayinthe com- Porter, Vision on Fire.On her post-war work in Canada during her last years,see Theresa Mor-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".