MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244995666 · doi:10.2523/105935-ms

Oxidation as a Rheology Modifier and a Potential Cause of Explosions in Oiland Synthetic-Based Drilling Fluids

2007· article· en· W4244995666 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Khalil Shahbazi, S. A. Mehta, Robert Moore, Matthew Ursenbach, Kees Van Fraassen

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsRheologyPetroleum engineeringDrilling fluidDrillingMaterials scienceComputer scienceBiochemical engineeringForensic engineeringGeologyEngineeringComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In drilling directional and horizontal wells, the oil and synthetic-based drilling fluids are required to exhibit high viscosity at low shear rates to properly suspend the weighting materials and drilling cuttings and to prevent sag and settling of weighting materials. This can be achieved by employing different rheology modifiers such as dimeric and trimeric fatty acids, imidazolines, amides, and synthetic polymers. Moreover, the safety of the drilling operation has been one of the main concerns of drilling companies.Since oil and synthetic-based drilling muds are widely used in high pressure high temperature wells, a set of drilling fluids commonly used in Western Canada were examined to study the effect of long exposure of the drilling mud with air. They consist of three oil base liquids (Diesel, Drillsol, and Distillate) and one synthetic base liquid (Envirodrill) together with water scavengers, viscosifiers, wetting materials, fluid loss controllers, and weighting materials. The drilling fluids were aged in stationary reactors in the presence of one charge of air for 52 hours at 150°C and 13.5 MPa initial pressure.This paper presents the results related to changes in rheological properties and occurrence of explosion in the drilling fluids employed. The results at different shear rates, ranging from ultra low shear rates to high shear rates, are presented. It is shown that the aged drilling fluid systems exhibited a tremendous increase in viscosity at ultra-low shear rates and relatively low increases at medium and high shear rates. Furthermore, the amounts of solids precipitated in the base liquids were correlated with the mononuclear aromatics content. While rapid heat releases or explosions in the synthetic-based drilling fluids were observed with 0.5 – 1.6 hours induction delay times with gradual increase in liquid phase temperature, oil-based systems were safe under the conditions tested.These experimental results imply that oxidation serves as a rheology modifier and induction delay time can be used as a warning parameter for an impeding explosion. Moreover, the impact of each chemical on the extent of increasing the viscosity and the occurrence of explosion is given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of International Symposium on Oilfield ChemistrySame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207