MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244998377 · doi:10.1111/1467-8322.12468

Front and Back Covers, Volume 34, Number 6. December 2018

2018· article· en· W4244998377 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropology Today · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolloGeographerFront (military)GlobeAstronomerWitnessArt historyHistoryArtPhilosophyGeographyCartographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Front and back cover caption, volume 34 issue 6 Front cover EARTHRISE ‘Earthrise’ involves learning to see all at once. In 1948, astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle predicted that ‘Once a photograph of the Earth, taken from outside, is available … a new idea as powerful as any in history will be let loose’. Fifty years ago, on Christmas Eve 1968, Apollo 8 astronaut Bill Anders took ‘arguably the most iconic photograph of the 20th century’ ‐ first witnessed as the earth appeared sideways from behind the moon's vertical horizon. Notwithstanding the 50th anniversary also being marked by reports that global wildlife populations have decreased by 60 per cent since 1970, ‘earthrise’ has been called ‘the most influential environmental photograph ever taken’ and quickly influenced the infant ecological movement. On Earth Day 1970, anthropologist Margaret Mead said ‘I think that the tenderness that lies in seeing the earth as small and lonely and blue is probably one of the most valuable things that we have now’. Apollo 8's moments of eye witness ‐ including the famous Christmas Eve broadcast which closed with words from the Book of Genesis ‐ played a part in ending the world as it was once known and in creating a world whose endings have become vividly apprehendable anew. But, as geographer Denis Cosgrove describes, the ‘meanings of the photographed earth were anticipated long before the photographs themselves were taken … for all its radical newness, actually witnessing the globe culminates a long genealogy of imagining and reflecting upon the possibility of doing so’. Historian Robert Poole suggests that the ‘earthrise’ photograph has ‘given the world a picture to think with’. As a new way of seeing and knowing, the particularities of thought and cultural history elicited by ‘earthrise’ imagery no doubt have important real‐world consequences ‐ and provide the anthropological telling point of Tony Crook's reflections on Earthrise +50 in this issue. Back cover WHAT DNA CAN'T TELL Since the 1980s, DNA analysis has been a key source of new knowledge about the origins of humankind. Studies of ‘ancestry informative’ regions of the genome, collected from living populations around the globe, have been used to reconstruct the trajectories of the earliest human migrations. As researchers have delved further into these population histories, their findings have demonstrated that mixture and migration have been constant and universal aspects of the human experience. Recently, however, the notion of DNA as a privileged window into human migrations has come full circle with the news that commercial genetic ancestry tests are being used in countries like Canada to verify the nationality of detained migrants scheduled for deportation. DNA ancestry testing is currently a booming global business, with over 16 million tests processed worldwide to date. Using high‐resolution genotyping analyses, companies estimate users' ‘ethnic’ origins and generate lists of ‘genetic relatives’ based on their shared DNA. Many present their products as offering profound insights into questions of personal origins and family ties. In this new development, state law enforcement agencies are taking advantage of growing commercial genetic databases and vast international genealogical networks to dispute the claimed identities of individuals in irregular migration cases. In her discussion of these practices, Sarah Abel asks: is genetics a useful tool for determining an individual's nationality? What ethical issues does this raise? And how can the misuse of these technologies be prevented? The image shown here is a detail from Micro chroma: From gonad to nomad by Kate Grant (Instagram @katewatercolours). The artwork, painted using resin with alkyd oil, depicts a human genetic migration map overlaid with developing sperm and ovarian follicles. It was commissioned by the CitiGen project, a HERA joint research programme that studies how the use of genomic data is informing public understandings of the past.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9170.872

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropology TodaySame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207