Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", Inquiry-Based Learning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (Stem) Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 4), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120150000004022 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Amelia J. Ahern-Rindell University of Portland, Portland, OR, USA Teresa Bettencourt University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal Patrick Blessinger International HETL Association, New York, NY, USA Barb Bloemhof McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Jacqueline Broerse VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Mindy Capaldi Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN, USA John M. Carfora Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA Lorraine Carter Nipissing University, North Bay, Ontario, Canada Fabio Dovigo University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy Richard R. Hake Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA Philip Hawes Whitireia Community Polytechnic, Porirua, New Zealand Henk Huijser Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education, Batchelor, Australia Megan Y. C. A. Kek University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia Les Kirkup University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Wanda S. Konijn VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Natalie Kuldell Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA Jeroen Maas VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Gina J. Mariano Troy University, Troy, AL, USA William F. McComas University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA Rudolph Mitchell Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA Vanessa R. Pitts Bannister Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, USA Vincenza Rocco University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy Richard E. Shope Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA Susana Silva University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Lorraine Stefani University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Ana Cristina Tavares University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Ruth Terwijn University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia Wendy Trimmer Whitireia Community Polytechnic, Porirua, New Zealand Dylan Powell Williams University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Baiba Zarins Nipissing University, North Bay, Ontario, Canada Marjolein B. M. Zweekhorst VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Book Chapters Inquiry-Based Learning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning Inquiry-Based Learning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (Stem) Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators Copyright Page List of Contributors Series Editor’s Introduction Foreword Part I: Concepts and Principles Innovative Approaches in Teaching and Learning: An Introduction to Inquiry-Based Learning for STEM Programs Inquiry-Based Learning in an Undergraduate Honours Program: Lessons from the Bachelor of Health Sciences Honours Program at McMaster University Two Decades of Inquiry-Oriented Learning in First Year Undergraduate Physics Laboratories: An Australian Experience Arnold Arons: Pioneer of Inquiry-Based Learning in Physics Part II: Practices and Strategies MIT’s Introduction to Biological Engineering: A Longitudinal Study of a Freshman Inquiry-Based Class Problem Based Learning Approaches to Teaching Chemistry An Intentional and Facilitative Student-Centered Approach to Enhance Inquiry-Based Learning through Authentic, Hypothesis-Driven Research IBL and Mathematics: The Necessity of Flexible Knowledge Advantages of Science Education Outdoors through IBSE Methodology Inquiry-Based Learning in Action: Reflections on an Interdisciplinary Master’s Program in the Health and Life Sciences A Narrative-Based Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program: Experiences and Insights Modeling Scientific Inquiry to Guide Students in the Practices of Science: The ED3U Teaching Model of Conceptual Change in Action Utilising Context in Learning Evaluating European Inquiry-Based Education Projects through the Lens of Evaluation Capacity Building Inquiry-Based Learning in Mathematics Enhancing Inquiry-Based Learning Environments with the Power of Problem-Based Learning to Teach 21st Century Learning and Skills About the Authors Author Index Subject Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it