Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", Inquiry-Based Learning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (Stem) Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 4), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120150000004022 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Amelia J. Ahern-Rindell University of Portland, Portland, OR, USA Teresa Bettencourt University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal Patrick Blessinger International HETL Association, New York, NY, USA Barb Bloemhof McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Jacqueline Broerse VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Mindy Capaldi Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN, USA John M. Carfora Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA Lorraine Carter Nipissing University, North Bay, Ontario, Canada Fabio Dovigo University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy Richard R. Hake Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA Philip Hawes Whitireia Community Polytechnic, Porirua, New Zealand Henk Huijser Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education, Batchelor, Australia Megan Y. C. A. Kek University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia Les Kirkup University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Wanda S. Konijn VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Natalie Kuldell Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA Jeroen Maas VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Gina J. Mariano Troy University, Troy, AL, USA William F. McComas University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA Rudolph Mitchell Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA Vanessa R. Pitts Bannister Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, USA Vincenza Rocco University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy Richard E. Shope Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA Susana Silva University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Lorraine Stefani University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Ana Cristina Tavares University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Ruth Terwijn University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia Wendy Trimmer Whitireia Community Polytechnic, Porirua, New Zealand Dylan Powell Williams University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Baiba Zarins Nipissing University, North Bay, Ontario, Canada Marjolein B. M. Zweekhorst VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Book Chapters Inquiry-Based Learning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning Inquiry-Based Learning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (Stem) Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators Copyright Page List of Contributors Series Editor’s Introduction Foreword Part I: Concepts and Principles Innovative Approaches in Teaching and Learning: An Introduction to Inquiry-Based Learning for STEM Programs Inquiry-Based Learning in an Undergraduate Honours Program: Lessons from the Bachelor of Health Sciences Honours Program at McMaster University Two Decades of Inquiry-Oriented Learning in First Year Undergraduate Physics Laboratories: An Australian Experience Arnold Arons: Pioneer of Inquiry-Based Learning in Physics Part II: Practices and Strategies MIT’s Introduction to Biological Engineering: A Longitudinal Study of a Freshman Inquiry-Based Class Problem Based Learning Approaches to Teaching Chemistry An Intentional and Facilitative Student-Centered Approach to Enhance Inquiry-Based Learning through Authentic, Hypothesis-Driven Research IBL and Mathematics: The Necessity of Flexible Knowledge Advantages of Science Education Outdoors through IBSE Methodology Inquiry-Based Learning in Action: Reflections on an Interdisciplinary Master’s Program in the Health and Life Sciences A Narrative-Based Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program: Experiences and Insights Modeling Scientific Inquiry to Guide Students in the Practices of Science: The ED3U Teaching Model of Conceptual Change in Action Utilising Context in Learning Evaluating European Inquiry-Based Education Projects through the Lens of Evaluation Capacity Building Inquiry-Based Learning in Mathematics Enhancing Inquiry-Based Learning Environments with the Power of Problem-Based Learning to Teach 21st Century Learning and Skills About the Authors Author Index Subject Index
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle