Endo‐β‐mannanase is present in an inactive form in ripening tomato fruits of the cultivar Walter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fruits of the tomato cultivar Walter undergo normal development to the red‐ripe stage but, unlike those of the cultivar Trust, they do not produce any active endo‐β‐mannanase. Reasons for this failure to produce the enzyme were sought. The cv. Walter contains genes for endo‐β‐mannanase, as shown by Southern blot analysis, and transcripts for the enzyme are present in ripening fruits, as revealed using Northern hybridization. Moreover, the enzyme protein is detectable by Western blots using an endo‐β‐mannanase‐specific antibody from tomato. In addition, the inactive enzyme is localized appropriately in the wall regions of the outer layers of the fruit (skin and outer pericarp). Mixing inactive fruit extracts of cv. Walter, in excess, with extracts from cv. Trust fruits, which contain active enzyme, leads to an increase rather than a reduction in enzyme activity, showing that there are no inhibitors of endo‐β‐mannanase in cv. Walter fruits. Similar results were obtained with fruits of the tomato cv. Heinz 1439. In contrast to the situation in fruits, the seeds of both cvs Walter and Heinz 1439 produce active enzyme, especially following germination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".