MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Body, in Interaction

2020· other· en· W4245120644 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Bouissac

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAction Observation and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModalitiesHuman bodyOrganismBalance (ability)Computer scienceHuman–computer interactionCommunicationCognitive sciencePsychologyBiologyArtificial intelligenceSociologyNeurosciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From arctic to tropical climates, on land and sea, the human body must meet numerous challenges, both physical and social, to survive and reproduce in an environment defined by the laws of gravity and evolution. As a social organism, the human primate develops and matures through a dense net of interactions with other humans and animals. The evolution of tool making provided the body with extensions that helped humans to successfully mediate these interactions in all sensorial modalities that have evolved as adaptations to its physical, biological, and social environments. Bipedal mobility, brachiation, and manual dexterity led to a range of adaptive behaviors including balance management, self‐care, and proximal and distal bodily interactions that have been regulated by various cultural constraints and have generated a rich gestural and lexical repertory. Technological advances keep expanding the interactive power of the human body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1040.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of Linguistic AnthropologySame topicAction Observation and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207