Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colons, Croles et Coolies: L'immigration runionnaise en Nouvelle-Caldonie (XIXe sicle) et le tayo de Saint-Louis, Karin Speedy (2007) Paris: L'Harmattan, 218 pp., ISBN 978-2-296-03575-1 (pbk), 19.50 The Living, Pascale Kramer, translated by Tamsin Black (2007) Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 136 pp., ISBN 978-0-8032-7823-3 (pbk), $19.95 criture en transhumance entre Maghreb et Afrique subsaharienne. Littrature, oralit, arts visuels, Hlne Tissires (2007) Paris: L'Harmattan, 293 pp., ISBN 978-2-296-02794-7 (pbk), 27,50 La Belgique entre deux sicles: laboratoire de la modernit, 18801914, Nathalie Aubert, Pierre-Philippe Fraiture, Patrick McGuinness (eds) (2007) Bern: Peter Lang, 272 pp, ISBN 3-03910-528-0 (pbk), 52.20, 39.20 French in Canada: Language Issues, Maeve Conrick and Vera Regan (2007) Bern: Peter Lang, 186 pp, ISBN 978-3-03910-142-9 (pbk), 40, 26 L'autobiographie dans l'espace francophone. II. L'Afrique, Diaz Narbona Inmaculada (d.), (2005) Cadiz: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cadiz (srie Estudios de Francofonia), 175 pp., ISBN 84-9828-003-6 (pbk), 11.54 Les fruits du cyclone. Une gopotique de la Carabe, Daniel Maximin, (2006) Paris: Seuil, 223 pp., ISBN 2-02-063095-8 (pbk), 22 Migrance compare Comparing Migration: Les littratures du Canada et du Qubec: The literatures of Canada and Qubec, Marie Carrire & Catherine Khordoc (eds), (2008) Bern, Berlin, Brussels, Frankfurt on Main, New York, Vienna: Peter Lang, 358 pp., ISBN 978-3-03911-317-0 (pbk), 45.30
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.517 | 0.466 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".