MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fugger Family

2016· reference-entry· en· W4245139586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mark Häberlein

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2016
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the late fifteenth to the early seventeenth centuries, the Fuggers of Augsburg were among the leading merchant-bankers of Europe. As the term merchant-bankers suggests, the family firm combined long-distance trade and financial services. The key to the Fuggers’ wealth was the marketing of Tyrolean and Hungarian copper and silver in return for loans to the rulers of the mining areas. The company operated a far-flung network of agencies and offices in major commercial cities such as Venice, Antwerp, Lisbon, and Seville; provided credit and banking services to the Habsburg emperors, the popes, and other European princes; and established sporadic ties with India and the New World. As information brokers, they collected newsletters from all over Europe and supplied relatives and princely clients with up-to-date information on political and military events. As Augsburg’s wealthiest mercantile family, the Fuggers also influenced the social and cultural life of the imperial city in various ways: They commissioned some of the earliest Renaissance buildings and artworks north of the Alps and initiated a major social housing project that is still in existence 500 years after its founding. As stalwart Catholics in a city that had largely turned Protestant during the Reformation, they ensured the survival of Catholicism by exerting their political influence and supporting religious orders, especially the Jesuits. The Fuggers’ influence also extended to neighboring territories: they not only extended loans to the Dukes of Bavaria, but also advised them on artistic matters and played an important role in the transfer of the aesthetic tastes of the Italian Renaissance to South German courts. Finally, the Fuggers exemplify the possibilities for social mobility in Renaissance Germany. Descendants of a rural weaver who had moved to Augsburg in 1367, they not only entered the highest echelon of urban society, the patriciate, in 1538, but even rose into the ranks of the imperial nobility, becoming hereditary counts in 1530, forming marital alliances with Bavarian and Austrian noble families, and purchasing extensive stretches of landed property. On the eve of the Thirty Years’ War, their territories comprised more than one hundred villages in eastern Swabia. While the Fuggers are frequently mentioned in textbooks and general overviews of the Renaissance and Reformation, scholarship is largely confined to German-language works. This article reflects the preponderance of literature in German while giving due credit to the works of French, British, and American scholars and to translations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1520.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207