MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The characteristics of particle charging and deposition during powder coating processes with coarse powder

2008· article· en· W4245143209 on OpenAlexaff
Xiangbo Meng, Hui Zhang, Jesse Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDeposition (geology)Powder coatingParticle (ecology)CoatingParticle depositionComposite materialChemical engineeringGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With coarse polyurethane powder, the characteristics of particle charging and deposition during corona charging processes of powder coating were experimentally investigated by measuring the charge-to-mass ratio (Q/M) and mass-to-surface ratio (M/S) of deposited particles. It was disclosed that the deposited particles present a cone-shaped distribution on the substrate, which is mainly a direct result of the inhomogeneous concentrations of in-flight charged particles, but the edge effect leads to a rise in particle accumulation in the fringe region. It was further disclosed that the particle deposition efficiency not only has a strong dependence on the particle primary charging efficiency but suffers a strong influence from back corona as well. The highest deposition efficiency is a compromise between the primary charging efficiency and the intensity of back corona. In addition, the number of overall deposited particles increases but the deposition rate decreases with spraying duration. On the other hand, it was demonstrated that the secondary charging mechanism dominates the characteristics of the charge-to-mass ratio of local deposited particles, but may suffer some influence from their particle sizes. For this coarse powder, the charge-to-mass ratio distribution presents a concave characteristic. Furthermore, the average charge-to-mass ratio of the overall deposited particles increases with charging voltage, due to the improvement in their charging efficiency, but decreases with spraying duration, due to the intensifying effect of back corona with the growing deposited layer. Significantly, this study provides a deeper insight into the charging and deposition mechanisms during powder coating processes and will be of great help for the improvement in related technologies of corona charging as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics D Applied PhysicsSame topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207