MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245151931 · doi:10.1520/stp45521s

Elastic <i>T</i>-Stress Solutions of Embedded Elliptical Cracks Subjected to Uniaxial and Biaxial Loadings

2007· book-chapter· en· W4245151931 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Qu, Xin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialStructural engineeringStress (linguistics)EngineeringPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The elastic T-stress has been found to be an important parameter in characterizing the near crack tip elastic-plastic stress states of 2-D and 3-D crack problems. In addition to the J-integral, the T-stress provides an effective two-parameter characterization of 2-D and 3-D elastic-plastic crack tip fields in a variety of crack configurations under small scale yielding conditions. Embedded elliptical crack in an infinite solid subjected to uniaxial or biaxial tension conditions represents an excellent model for many engineering components with embedded cracks. Although extensive analyses are available for stress intensity factors (SIFs) for embedded elliptical cracks, to date no analytical T-stress solutions are available. This paper presents the exact close form solutions for elastic T-stress of an embedded elliptical crack in an infinite body under remote uniaxial or biaxial tension. The foundation of the derivation is based on the potential method for three-dimensional elasticity. Solutions of stress components parallel to and perpendicular to the cracked plane are derived first. T-stress is then obtained from the asymptotic stress field near the crack front. Complete solutions of T-stress along the crack front are established. Further, three-dimensional finite element analyses are conducted to verify the derived solutions; excellent agreements are achieved. When combined with the corresponding K or J solutions, these T-stress solutions are suitable for the analysis of constraint effects for embedded elliptical shaped cracks in engineering components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207