Qualifications Required for SAE Type I Aircraft Deicing/Anti-Icing Fluids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This document describes: <ol class="list nostyle"> <li class="list-item"> <span class="li-label">a</span> <div class="htmlview paragraph">the preparatory steps to test experimental Type I fluids according to AMS1424;</div></li> <li class="list-item"> <span class="li-label">b</span> <div class="htmlview paragraph">the recommendations for the preparation of samples for endurance time testing according to ARP5945;</div></li> <li class="list-item"> <span class="li-label">c</span> <div class="htmlview paragraph">a short description of the recommended field spray test;</div></li> <li class="list-item"> <span class="li-label">d</span> <div class="htmlview paragraph">the protocol to demonstrate that Type I fluid can be used with the Type I holdover time guidelines published by the FAA and Transport Canada, including endurance time data obtained from ARP5945;</div></li> <li class="list-item"> <span class="li-label">e</span> <div class="htmlview paragraph">the protocol for inclusion of Type I fluids on the FAA and Transport Canada lists of fluids;</div></li> <li class="list-item"> <span class="li-label">f</span> <div class="htmlview paragraph">the protocol for updating the FAA and Transport Canada lists of fluids;</div></li> <li class="list-item"> <span class="li-label">g</span> <div class="htmlview paragraph">the role of the SAE G-12 Aircraft Deicing Fluids Committee;</div></li> <li class="list-item"> <span class="li-label">h</span> <div class="htmlview paragraph">the role of the SAE G-12 Holdover Time Committee; and</div></li> <li class="list-item"> <span class="li-label">i</span> <div class="htmlview paragraph">the process for the publication of Type I holdover time guidelines.</div></li></ol></div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This document does not describe laboratory-testing procedures.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This document does not include the qualification requirements for AMS1428 Type II, III, and IV fluids (these are provided in ARP5718).</div></div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".