The Current Status of the Publishing Industry in China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article retrospectively analyzes the current situation of the development of China's publishing industry and illustrates the scale, structure, new publication patterns, and characteristics of this industry. The results reveal that the continuous development of China's publishing industry is manifested in the solid growth of traditional publishing and the rapid growth of non-paper-based publications. Digital and network technologies have become the critical foundations of the publishing industry, facilitating the expansion of the traditional publishing industry and the renewal of traditional productivity. Moreover, the dominance of books giving way to a more diversified publishing pattern. An industry chain primarily based on provinces is under construction, and the leading publishers are beginning to orient toward industrial development. The basic formation of a dual-capital system, funded both federally and privately, has accelerated the process of publishing socialization. In contrast to the previous system under the planned economy, this new system is demarcated into missions for information dissemination and the pursuit of profit, a fundamental change known as the “dichotomy pattern” that powerfully promotes the prosperity and advancement of China's publishing industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.094 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.055 | 0.076 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it