MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245324638 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2004.1334120

ICA filters for lighting invariant face recognition

2004· article· en· W4245324638 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceFacial recognition systemIndependent component analysisPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceInvariant (physics)Computer visionSubspace topologyPrincipal component analysisCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionGaussianFeature extractionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of ICA (independent component analysis) for the construction of filters for lighting invariant face recognition is investigated. ICA is used to provide filters which are applied as a pre-processing step to a low dimensional PCA subspace representation of the databases. Test faces imaged under varying illumination from a face database are classified using a support vector classifier. The ICA pre-filter recognition results are compared against those using LoG (Laplacian of Gaussian) filter of various spatial resolutions and no pre-filtering. The ICA pre-filters are shown to be very effective at selectively reducing the effect of illumination variance in object and face recognition without the need for tuning the filters to the orientations and spatial resolutions present in the images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it