MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245331452 · doi:10.1002/ange.201505934

Unusual H‐Bond Topology and Bifurcated H‐bonds in the 2‐Fluoroethanol Trimer

2015· article· en· W4245331452 on OpenAlexafffund
Javix Thomas, Xunchen Liu, Wolfgang Jäger, Yunjie Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsTrimerTopology (electrical circuits)Chirality (physics)ChemistryMoleculeSingle bondHydrogen bondNatural bond orbitalLone pairCrystallographyComputational chemistryChemical physicsDimerOrganic chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanicsChiral symmetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract By using a combination of rotational spectroscopy and ab initio calculations, an unusual H‐bond topology was revealed for the 2‐fluoroethanol trimer. The trimer exhibits a strong heterochiral preference and adopts an open OH⋅⋅⋅OH H‐bond topology while utilizing two types of bifurcated H‐bonds involving organic fluorine. This is in stark contrast to the cyclic OH⋅⋅⋅OH H‐bond topology adopted by trimers of water and other simple alcohols. The strengths of different H‐bonds in the trimer were analyzed by using the quantum theory of atoms in molecules. The study showcases a remarkable example of a chirality‐induced switch in H‐bond topology in a simple transient chiral fluoroalcohol. It provides important insight into the H‐bond topologies of small fluoroalcohol aggregates, which are proposed to play a key role in protein folding and in enantioselective reactions and separations where fluoroalcohols serve as a (co)solvent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte ChemieSame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207