MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Illustration

2015· other· en· W4245348581 on OpenAlexaff
Lorraine Janzen Kooistra

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Victorian Literature · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)Period (music)LiteracyVisual literacyVisual artsHistoryLinguisticsSociologyPsychologyAestheticsArtMathematics educationPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The literature of the Victorian period regularly appeared in illustrated form, regardless of genre, format, and audience. The explosion of illustrated books and periodicals came about through both social and technological changes. By the end of the century, illustrated literature in diverse forms was available for Victorians across generations and classes. The knowledge that their work would be illustrated affected writers, while the interplay of picture and word contributed to readers’ understanding of genre and interpretation. As a multimedia form combining image and text, illustrated works highlighted collaborative authorship and trained readers in verbal/visual literacy, contributing to modern visual culture in a newly industrialized and urbanized society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Victorian LiteratureSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207