MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245355000 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-01/16/1171

(Invited) Emission from Strained Germanium Nanocrystals

2018· article· en· W4245355000 on OpenAlexaff
N. L. Rowell, D. J. Lockwood

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermaniumPhotoluminescenceMaterials sciencePhononLasing thresholdSiliconBand gapEpitaxyNanocrystalOptoelectronicsCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A silicon-compatible group IV coherent light source remains the missing link in Si-based photonics, despite much effort. Recently lasing and high efficiency photoluminescence (PL) have been shown for germanium (Ge), a material with a relatively small indirect to direct bandgap (BG) difference. We previously had observed a very intense, low temperature PL in dozens of samples for MBE-grown Si1-xGex epitaxial layers with x from 0.05 to 0.53, with quantum efficiencies up to 5%. This PL was neither defect nor dislocation related, but appeared to be strong with a large lifetime due to localization effects. As shown in Fig. 1, the PL consisted of a broad peak with asymmetry to low photon energies. With Ge fraction this peak was constant in shape and tracked the BG variation, but was ~80 meV below the indirect BG for strained SiGe. The width of this peak at ~50 meV was too small to be due to a no phonon (NP) line with its TO phonon replica if the material were Si or SiGe as the NP-TO spacing is about 58 meV for those materials. Fig. 1 shows that for higher Ge fractions the PL is emitted at energies significantly below those for bulk Ge, with its BG of 744 meV. This broad, intense PL peak has been unexplained, although a morphological origin was suggested by TEM. Here we will show from PL data that the peak is due to Ge nanocrystals (NCs) imbedded in SiGe layers (see Fig. 2). Epitaxy requires that the SiGe epilayers and the Ge NCs be lattice matched to Si (001) in the x-y plane, so that both the SiGe and NCs are under compression in that plane. Unconstrained in the vertical (z) direction, the epilayer is under tensile strain, leading to a vertical lattice constant that increases with Ge fraction and is larger than that for unstrained SiGe. Here the volume of the unit cell for the epitaxial SiGe is assumed to be the same as that for unstrained SiGe. The lattice of the Ge NCs is constrained to match the SiGe epilayer vertically. For relatively Si-rich SiGe, the Ge NCs are under compression vertically, but for more Ge-rich SiGe the vertical lattice constant of the strained SiGe exceeds that of bulk Ge. At this point the vertical strain in the Ge NC becomes tensile, which first occurs for a Ge fraction in the SiGe of 0.36 (Fig. 3 - red trace). The BG variation in Ge with uniaxial strain can be computed using deformation potential theory. As the strain becomes more strongly tensile both the direct and indirect gap energies decline, with the direct energy decreasing more rapidly than the indirect one. As shown in the blue traces of Fig. 3, the direct gap crosses the indirect at a tensile uniaxial strain of 4.4%, resulting in a direct gap semiconductor, a highly desirable outcome. Our results with PL point the way to this transition point, but the maximum vertical tensile strain for the present Ge NCs is not much greater than 2.1%. Nonetheless, the fact that we see PL below the indirect BG of bulk Ge is explained by the Ge NCs being under tensile strain vertically, reducing their BG. The broad peak width and shape can be curve resolved with two peaks, each ~30 meV wide, separated by ~35 meV, i.e., very near the momentum conserving TO phonon energy for Ge.The NP peak is wide (25-30 meV) due in part to confinement shift variations from size variability and to alloy disorder broadening in the SiGe. To test our hypothesis further, we have calculated the emission energy in a numerical model that includes the effects of strain on the Ge BG and of the confinement blue shifts on exciton energy for both the SiGe layers and the imbedded NCs, the latter assumed to be of a single vertical size (2.5 nm). The calculated energies for over 45 samples of varying composition are compared with the measured PL energies in Fig. 4, where the slope is somewhat different from the expected value of unity due to possible lower order influences, such as variations in the NC size and deviations from the linear deformation potential model for the strained BG. However, we do have very good general agreement between our computed emission energies and those observed in PL, which provides validation for our theory that imbedded Ge NCs have given rise through carrier localization in three dimensions to the intense, broad PL observed in MBE grown SiGe. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207