MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245357815 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/54fg8

Meta Volante 1a: Implementación HPL

2021· preprint· es· W4245357815 on OpenAlexaff
Simón Marín Giraldo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKnowledge Societies in the 21st Century
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente documento tiene por objetivo demostrar el proceso de ejecución de HPL en un cluster de 2 nodos con la intención de obtener un desempeño de como mínimo el 80% con respecto al máximo desempeño posible de la máquina calculado de manera teórica. A continuación se expondrá el entorno de ejecución, el máximo desempeño teórico de la máquina, las optimizaciones realizadas y aquellas que potencialmente serían útiles pero no pudieron ser implementadas por el equipo de trabajo en el marco de tiempo dispuesto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicKnowledge Societies in the 21st CenturyFrench-language works237,207