MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245393113 · doi:10.33423/ajm.v18i3.76

Making Sense of Time Value of Money and Agency Considerations in Structuring Legal Settlements in Canada

2018· article· en· W4245393113 on OpenAlexaffabout
Neal Willcott, Alex Faseruk

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Management · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlaintiffPunitive damagesDamagesHuman settlementStructuringAgency (philosophy)BusinessLawValue (mathematics)Settlement (finance)Law and economicsCommon lawPolitical scienceEconomicsSociologyFinanceGeographyPayment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In countries following common law practices, courts award compensatory or punitive damages toaggrieved plaintiffs in civil trials. Given the growing litigious nature of the public, many parties on the defending side have lobbied for caps to be placed on these settlements as they may be quite large. Courts rely on expert witnesses, such as actuaries and time value of money experts, to provide a quantum of the damages, which will either be paid in a lump sum upfront or spread out over a finite period. On the opposite side are lawyers representing the plaintiff arguing against caps in advocating on behalf of victims. This paper examines the issues associated with the structuring of these settlements from a financial perspective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of ManagementSame topicLaw, Economics, and Judicial SystemsFrench-language works237,207