MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245399092 · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2010.06.008

Following the case of fat grafting in glandular tissue, a comment on “lipomodelling of the breast: A review” in the breast volume 19, issue 3, 2010

2010· letter· en· W4245399092 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Arsenault, Michel Alain Danino

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Breast · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVolume (thermodynamics)Breast tissueBreast cancerInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We first wanted to congratulate Drs ELFadl et coll for the exhaustive review. We want to discuss the section “Oncological safety of lipomodelling”: We think the reader must have a 360° view of the recently published literature on this hot topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0630.049
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe BreastSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207