MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4245408366 · doi:10.5194/acp-2019-895

Decadal changes in anthropogenic source contribution of PM <sub>2.5</sub> pollution and related health impacts in China, 1990–2015

2019· preprint· en· W4245408366 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jun Liu, Yixuan Zheng, Guannan Geng, Chaopeng Hong, Meng Li, Xin Li, Fei Liu, Dan Tong, Ruili Wu, Bo Zheng, Kebin He, Qiang Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDalhousie UniversityChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEmory University
KeywordsChinaParticulatesEnvironmental scienceAir pollutionAgricultureAir quality indexPollutionGeographyMeteorologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Air quality in China has changed dramatically in response to rapid development of economy and policies. In this work, we investigate the changes of anthropogenic source contribution to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution and related health impacts in China during 1990–2015 and elucidate the drivers behind the decadal transition. We estimate the contribution of five anthropogenic emitting sectors to ambient PM2.5 exposure and related premature mortality over China during 1990–2015 with 5-yr intervals, by using an integrated model framework of bottom-up emission inventory, chemical transport model, and the Global Exposure Mortality Model (GEMM). The national anthropogenic PM2.5-related premature mortality estimated with GEMM for the nonaccidental deaths due to noncommunicable diseases and lower respiratory infections rose from 1.26 million (95 % CI: 1.05, 1.46) in 1990 to 2.18 million (95 % CI: 1.84, 2.50) in 2005; then, it decreased to 2.10 million (95 % CI: 1.76, 2.42) in 2015. In 1990, the residential sector was the leading source of the PM2.5-related premature mortality [559,000 (95 % CI: 467,000, 645,900), 44 % of total] in China, followed by industry (29 %), power (13 %), agriculture (9 %) and transportation (5 %). In 2015, the industrial sector became the largest contributor of PM2.5-related premature mortality [734,000 (95 % CI: 615,500, 844,900), 35 % of total], followed by residential (25 %), agriculture (23 %), transportation (10 %) and power (6 %). The decadal changes in source contribution to PM2.5-related premature mortality in China represents a combined impact of socioeconomic development and clean air policy. For example, active control measures have successfully reduced pollution from power sector, while contribution from industrial and transportation sector continuously increased due to more prominent growth of activity rates. Transition in fuel consumption dominated the decrease of contribution from residential sector. In the meanwhile, contribution from agriculture sector continuously increased due to persistent NH3 emissions and enhanced formation of secondary inorganic aerosols under a NH3 rich environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→