MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4245414089 · doi:10.2196/preprints.24745

Effect of a Wearable Motion Sensor Device in Facilitating In-Home Rehabilitation Program in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty (Preprint)

2020· preprint· en· W4245414089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu‐Pin Chen, Chung‐Ying Lin, Yi‐Jie Kuo, Oscar K. Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntraclass correlationMedicinePhysical therapyRange of motionTotal knee arthroplastyRehabilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationArthroplastyInter-rater reliabilityOsteoarthritisSurgeryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Postoperative rehabilitation programs are essential for facilitating functional recovery after TKA. However, clinical results vary because of inconsistent patient compliance. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to verify the feasibility of a treatment model that involves applying a wearable motion sensor device (MSD) to assist patients in performing home-based exercises after TKA. METHODS The MSD comprised inertial measurement unit–based sensors and mobile apps for patients and physicians, which allowed for knee mobility tracing, home-based exercise support, and progress monitoring. The interrater reliability of knee mobility measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Different knee flexion angles and the time spent for completing the 5-times sit-to-stand test (5TSST) in 12 healthy participants were measured by 2 experienced physicians and using the MSD, and their results were compared using ICC. A pilot prospective control trial was then conducted, in which 12 patients following TKA were allocated to 2 groups: the home-based exercise group and the MSD-assisted rehabilitation group. Changes in knee range of motion, pain, functional score (assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index), performance (tested using 5TSST), and exercise completion rates were compared between the groups over 2 months of follow-up. RESULTS Knee flexion at different angles and the time spent for completing 5TSST measured using the MSD exhibited excellent reliability compared with the physician measurements (ICC range: 0.996 and 0.996 respectively). Furthermore, patients in the MSD-assisted rehabilitation group reported higher exercise completion rate within 2 months of the in-home exercise program compared with participants in the home-based exercise group, which lead to more favorable outcomes in the knee extension angle and maximal and average angular velocity in 5TSST. CONCLUSIONS MSD-assisted home-based rehabilitation following TKA is a useful treatment model for telerehabilitation because it enhances patients’ compliance to training, which improves functional recovery. This method helps overcome critical obstacles in home-based physiotherapy among patients after TKA. Therefore, this study has crucial implications for patients and health systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes→French-language works237,207→