MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4245423723 · doi:10.24124/2015/bpgub1180

Adults experiencing mental health and addiction in Prince George

2015· dissertation· en· W4245423723 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia Okpodi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumMental healthAddictionModalitiesPsychologyMental illnessSocial workSocial skillsClinical PracticeMedical educationPsychiatryMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this practicum was to learn about adult mental health and addiction services available in Prince George, and to gain an in-depth understanding from practitioners on the addiction behaviors unveiled by adults. This practicum report describes the learning experience and the approaches used to familiarize with clinical skills and practice/counseling modalities of the CAST program offered by the Northern Health Authority (NH or NHA). The understanding and development of these clinical skills and counseling modalities has subsequently exposed me to other practice models used within Northern Health and has improved my personal professional practice, and the ability to provide mental health services to adults living with addictions. This learning experience has not only enhanced my clinical skills, but also equipped the student for future clinical social work practices. The student is confident in her abilities to support patients to strive for emotional and psychological well-being and avert other challenges and disabilities associated with mental illness and substance misuse. --Leaf ii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→