MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245435710 · doi:10.1353/book.57058

Academic Ableism

2017· book· en· W4245435710 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Michigan Press eBooks · 2017
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, DavisCouncil of Ontario UniversitiesUniversity of MinnesotaHarvard UniversityRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteNorth Carolina State UniversityUtah State UniversityOhio State UniversityState University of New YorkNational Council on DisabilityArchitectural League of New York
KeywordsAbleismSociologyPolitical scienceGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cover features bold colors and bold, oversize typography.Against a black background the word ACADEMIC is written in white and the word ABLEISM in red.The cover is not wide enough to accommodate the size of these words, so the words are intentionally broken: ACA-, then below this DEMIC, then below this ABLE-and then ISM (suggesting among other things that something in academia is broken).To the left is a small photograph of the sculpture Untitled (Spiral Staircase) by Peter Coffin.The sculpture consists of metal stairs that go nowhere, but instead curve back into themselves in one continuous tangle.The author's name, Jay Timothy Dolmage, appears in the top left corner; at the bottom of the page is the subtitle of the book, DISABILITY AND HIGHER EDUCATION.Thanks to all of the folks who have shared their energy and dedication through the Committee on Disability Issues in College Composition over the years, from my mentor Cindy Lewiecki-Wilson to my first, finest, and continued coconspirators Stephanie Kerschbaum, Margaret Price, and Amy Vidali, through to all of those who will continue this work into the future.Thanks to Brenda Brueggeman for tremendous, honest feedback.Thanks to the University of Michigan Press, the Editorial Board, and LeAnn Fields, for supporting not just the book but also its accessible delivery.This book is intended to be useful to others, to make space for future advocacy and thinking, and to be built on, critiqued, and exceeded.Like most academic work, nothing here is truly mine, nothing truly new or original.This book is the product of learning with and from others.If I could, I'd list hundreds of coauthors, with my name last. Contents In Canada, with a different but similarly devastating history of enslavement and dispossession, (nonetheless) university founders relied on what Ian Mosby calls "colonial science."I would define that as experimentation on aboriginal peoples in the name of or under the disguise of reeducation or assimilation, as well as the depletion of their connections to the environment and the deletion of their own forms of knowledge.This colonial science was thoroughly institutionalized and reinforced by government policy, at the same time establishing the knowledge and power of universities.These eugenic practices, and in fact eugenics itself, can be seen as the invention of the North American university, which in turn was also built upon the exploitation of people with disabilities.Colleges and universities were colonial projects-places for settlers to continue the work of forcibly changing their landscapes and these landscapes' inhabitants, but also as sites of a sort of internalized imperialism, because universities were mainly where North Americans went to Europeanize.Eugenics was not just implicated in these moves, but was in many ways the perfect ideological vehicle for the settler colonialism of higher education.More simply, academia became the place where North Americans could most efficiently destroy what and who came before European settlement.Eugenics-the idea that certain bodies were biologically inferior-was rhetorical fuel for this very efficient destruction.In Canada, there has been some public acknowledgment of this history, following the Canadian government's settlement and apology for the ongoing abuse of aboriginal children in residential schools.As the opening passage of the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Report, developed as part of this ongoing apology, states: "For over a century, the central goals of Canada's Aboriginal policy were to eliminate Aboriginal governments; ignore Aboriginal rights; terminate the Treaties; and, through a process of assimilation, cause Aboriginal peoples to cease to exist as distinct legal, social, cultural, religious, and racial entities in Canada" (1).As indigenous scholar Richard Atleo writes in Principles of Tsawalk, the evolutionary ideas of Darwin were effectively transformed into eugenic rhetorics that were employed against indigenous people because they "created, for colonizers, a view of differences between people that was and is characterized by superiority and inferiority" (9).Absorbed early into political and imperialist domination ideologies, Darwin's theories of natural determinism justified the white European's central mythological conviction of racial superiority (Saul, 9).As Canadian public intellectual John Ralston Saul writes, "Canadians of 1. Movement-getting there-how we get to an event or class.2. Sense-being there-how we access the material, the conversation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Michigan Press eBooksSame topicResilience and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207