MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245508043 · doi:10.4000/textyles.444

Fréché (Bibiane), Littérature et société en Belgique francophone (1944-1960)

2010· article· fr· W4245508043 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Biron

Bibliographic record

VenueTextyles · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Policy, and Dickens Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchArtHumanitiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Période mal connue et mal aimée de l’histoire littéraire en Belgique francophone, le milieu du xxe siècle est associé le plus souvent au néoclassicisme pratiqué par des auteurs qui ont tout fait pour élever la littérature à la hauteur d’un universalisme abstrait qui est vite passé de mode. La critique a plutôt tourné son regard du côté des « irréguliers du langage », selon l’expression de Marc Quaghebeur. Mais la littérature qui se fait entre la Libération et les Golden Sixties, selon la thès...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTextylesSame topicMigration, Policy, and Dickens StudiesFrench-language works237,207