Electromagnetic and Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging of a Red‐Sided Garter Snake Hibernaculum at Narcisse, Manitoba, Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreviousNext No AccessSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2000Electromagnetic and Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging of a Red‐Sided Garter Snake Hibernaculum at Narcisse, Manitoba, CanadaAuthors: V. MarisI. J. FergusonV. MarisUniversity of Manitoba Department of Geological Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2 and I. J. FergusonUniversity of Manitoba Department of Geological Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922842 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit Abstract Introductory paragraph for this paper is available only in the PDF and GZipped PS filesPermalink: https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922842FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2000 ISSN (online):1554-8015 Copyright: 2000 Pages: 1255 publication data© 2000 Copyright © 2000 The Environmental and Engineering Geophysical SocietyPublisher:Environmental & Engineering Geophysical Society HistoryPublished Online: 30 Sep 2008 CITATION INFORMATION V. Maris and I. J. Ferguson, (2000), "Electromagnetic and Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging of a Red‐Sided Garter Snake Hibernaculum at Narcisse, Manitoba, Canada," Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems Proceedings : 999-1008. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922842 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it