MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heterothallism in the Microascaceae demonstrated by three species in the <i>Scopulariopsis brevicaulis</i> series

2001· article· en· W4245590433 on OpenAlexafffund
Sean P. Abbott, Lynne Sigler

Bibliographic record

VenueMycologia · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDirectorate for Biological SciencesKillam TrustsAlberta Conservation Association
KeywordsBiologyBotanyConidiumMating typeTaxonomy (biology)TaxonSpecies complexAscomycotaZoologyPhylogenetic treeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scopulariopsis anamorphs are known for many species of the genus Microascus (Ascomycota, Microascaceae), but teleomorph connections for anamorphic species within the ‘Scopulariopsis brevicaulis series' are tenuous or lacking. Microascus brevicaulis was recently described as the teleomorph of the type and commonest species, S. brevicaulis, but only a few isolates yielded fertile perithecia. To investigate whether paucity of sexual reproduction was the result of heterothallism, mating experiments were conducted among isolates representing the species S. brevicaulis, S. Candida, S. asperula, S. fusca and S. koningii. Results demonstrated heterothallism within three species and confirmed that two taxa could be reduced to synonymy. Three holomorph species, M. brevicaulis, M. manginii, and M. niger, are recognized to include anamorphs S. brevicaulis (synonym S. koningii), S. Candida, and S. asperula (synonyms S. arnoldii, S. bestae, S. fusca, and S. roseola), respectively. Microascus niger is redescribed and a neotype proposed. The three species are most readily recognized by colony color (sandy tan to avellaneous in M. brevicaulis, white to cream in M. manginii, and medium to dark fuscous brown in M. niger). These colonial distinctions correlate generally with conidia that are coarsely roughened, smooth, or finely roughened, respectively. However, conidium ornamentation, previously considered a reliable taxonomic character, is shown to be variable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMycologiaSame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207