MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[no title]

2020· article· id· W4245603703 on OpenAlex
Ahmad Mahyani, Slamet Suhartono, Dwi Putri Sartik, Johanes Dipa Widjaya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUIR LAW REVIEW · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Justice Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdministration (probate law)RestructuringContext (archaeology)Public administrationIndependence (probability theory)State (computer science)Government (linguistics)State lawPolitical scienceCorporate governanceLawBusinessGeographyStatute

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The state recognizes and respect the Village as a legal community unit that has the authorithy to regulate and manage gonverment affairs and the rights of origin and traditional autonomous. In the context of recognition and respect, since the independence of Indonesia several regulation have been enacted which from the legal basic for implementing village governance. The enactment of Law number of 2014 concerning villages and their implementing laws and regulations also bring legal consequences to the administration of the village administration, including the restructuring of village apparatus, the preparation of village development plans and other legal consequences. This research focuses on the implementation of law no 6 of 2014 specifically the preparation of the village budget and the orderly administration of the village so that it can be seen the problems experienced by the village government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it