UPAYA MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPS MATERI AKTIVITAS EKONOMI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE MAKE A MATCH DI KELAS IV MIN MEDAN TEMBUNG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui (1) hasil belajar sebelum menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make A Match pada mata pelajaran IPS Materi Aktivitas Ekonomi di kelas IV MIN Medan Tembung, (2) hasil belajar setelah menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make A Match pada mata pelajaran IPS materi Aktivitas Ekonomi di kelas IV MIN Medan Tembung, dan (3) Penerapan menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make A Match pada mata pelajaran IPS yang dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas IV MIN Medan Tembung. Penelitian ini berupa PTK (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas), dengan subjek penelitian berjumlah 35 siswa. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian adalah: (1) hasil belajar siswa sebelum tindakan mendapat nilai rata-rata 71,42, siswa yang tuntas sebanyak 34,29% (12 siswa). (2) hasil belajar siswa setelah diterapkan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make A Match pada siklus I nilai rata-rata menjadi 77,72 siswa yang tuntas sebanyak 62,86% (22 siswa). (3) hasil belajar siklus II nilai rata-rata meningkat menjadi 82 siswa yang tuntas sebanyak 80% (28 siswa).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".