MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nitric Oxide Relaxes the Vascular Smooth Muscle Independently of Endothelin-1- and U46619-Induced Intracellular Increase of Calcium

2000· article· en· W4245644856 on OpenAlexaff
Ghassan Bkaily, Hadia Shbaklo, Magda Taoudi-Benchekroun, Sawsan Sader, Martine Duval, Danielle Jacques, Pedro D’Orléans-Juste

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitric oxideSodium nitroprussideVascular smooth muscleThromboxane A2ChemistryVasodilationEndothelin receptorEndothelin 1EndocrinologyEndothelium-derived relaxing factorInternal medicineCalciumEndotheliumCalcium in biologyMedicineSmooth musclePlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary: A balance between circulating and locally released vasoconstrictors, such as endothelin-1 (ET-1), and vasodilators, such as nitric oxide, controls vascular smooth muscle tone. In the study reported here, using the technique of simultaneous measurements of intracellular free calcium ([Ca2+]i) and tension, we investigated the effects of a nitric oxide donor, sodium nitroprusside (NaNP) on endothelin-1- and U46619- [a thromboxane angiotensin-II (TXA-II) mimetic] induced sustained increases in tension and [Ca2+]i in intact and endothelium-denuded rabbit thoracic aortas. Our results showed that, in both intact and endothelium-denuded preparations, the nitric oxide donor NaNP (10-6 M) reverses the ET-1- (10-7 M) and U46619- (10-7 M) induced sustained increase in tension but not in [Ca2+]i. However, it did not reduce the ET-1- and U46619-induced responses. Our data suggest that nitric oxide production modulates vascular smooth muscle tension via a mechanism that is independent of that generated by vasoconstrictors such as ET-1 and TXA-II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular PharmacologySame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207